AI Smart Contract Pre-Audit
Launch with fewer surprises. AI Smart Contract Pre-Audit is a free, automated first-pass review of Solidity contracts for blockchain projects during our public testing phase. Submit your code online, get a structured report, and fix the most common security and architecture issues before a manual audit.
Completely free. Submit your Smart Contract and receive a detailed audit report by email.
Automated Solidity review that flags security and logic risks with fix guidance.
Use it as a first filter to spot high-impact issues before a manual audit.
What this service is
AI Smart Contract Audit is an automated first-pass review that helps blockchain teams catch common vulnerabilities and architecture risks early.
It is best used for:
- Internal QA and rapid development iterations
- Pre-deploy checks and release readiness preparation
- Improving audit readiness before a full manual review
This is a practical screening step, not a substitute for a full professional audit.
What our AI is based on
The analysis follows widely used security references for Solidity-based blockchain projects and applies them in a consistent reporting format.
It draws on:
- OpenZeppelin patterns and secure development practices
- Industry security checklists and verification standards
- Solidity vulnerability classifications and known weakness patterns
The result is a structured report aligned with what experienced audit teams typically review first.
How it works
Upload .sol / .zip / .pdf, or paste a repository URL.
The model reviews the code for common vulnerability patterns and logic risks.
Due to high demand during public testing, we send the report as soon as possible, typically within 24 hours.
Important: Do not include private keys, seed phrases, or secrets in submitted files.
What you receive
You get a structured report in Markdown that you can hand to an engineer and use in a crypto development sprint.
Report includes:
-
Architecture overview and key contract components;
-
Findings grouped by severity with clear reasoning;
-
Code-level notes and practical remediation guidance;
-
A dedicated Admin Privileges Check section, often the main source of critical risk in DeFi and token contracts;
-
A short “quick filter” summary to support internal review and release readiness.
What the AI checks
This service focuses on issues that regularly cause real losses and failed deployments in crypto projects.
-
Admin privileges and access control
The AI reviews ownership and role design, admin-only paths, upgrade authority, and privilege boundaries. The goal is to surface overpowered roles, hidden control paths, and configuration mistakes that can undermine trust.
-
Fund safety and drain scenarios
The AI flags patterns that can enable unintended fund movement, unsafe withdrawal flows, and brittle transfer logic. This includes common failure modes that may allow assets to be pulled or redirected.
-
Token supply and mint/burn mechanics
The AI assesses mint and burn flows, supply caps, role restrictions, and accounting consistency. These checks aim to catch supply inflation risk, privileged supply changes, and broken balance assumptions.
-
External calls and reentrancy exposure
The AI examines call patterns, state-change ordering, and integrations that can trigger reentrancy or unexpected callbacks. This helps identify unsafe external interactions and missing guards.
-
DoS vectors and stuck states
The AI highlights designs that can be blocked by gas limits, loops, griefing, or faulty state transitions. The intent is to detect paths where withdrawals, claims, or finalization can get stuck.
-
Standards and best-practice alignment
The AI checks for deviations from established Solidity patterns, unusual ERC behavior, and common upgradeability pitfalls. This reduces avoidable issues related to design conventions and expected token behavior.
When you still need a manual audit
If your contracts control significant value, manage user deposits, or include complex protocol logic, a professional manual audit is still the right next step.
An AI review helps catch common issues early, but it cannot guarantee complete coverage. Custom mechanics, edge cases, and integration risks often require line-by-line analysis, protocol-level reasoning, and validation across trust boundaries.
For launches, upgrades, listings, fundraising, and external due diligence, move from automated screening to independent smart contract audit services. A full audit combines deep manual review with proven security tooling, delivers a clear report with prioritized fixes, and includes a retest to confirm remediation before deployment.
Access, pricing, and responsible use
We want teams to use this tool responsibly. During public testing, access is free.
-
This report is not a guarantee of security.
-
It is not a substitute for an independent professional audit.
-
It should not be used as “official proof” of safety for investor communications, token listings, or exchange procedures.
-
Results may contain errors or omissions, especially with complex logic, custom standards, or partial code submissions.
-
If you plan to deploy contracts that manage meaningful value, treat this as an early warning system, not the final sign-off.
For many teams, the practical question is cost and timing. This first step helps identify obvious risks early and reduce time spent on basic issues during a later manual audit. If you move to a full smart contract security audit, scope and architecture largely determine the final price.
